My Top 6 Noise Blocking Earmuffs Review

In this post, I want to provide an overview and detailed review of noise blocking earmuffs.

Regular readers of my Blog know that I am into blocking noise to reduce stress and improve cognitive performance and sleep. Many studies show a large positive impact of noise reduction on all kinds of mental tasks, including studying, reading comprehension, writing, serial memory, proof reading, mental math, and so on.

my top 6 noise blocking earmuffs review

As a student and as a professional, you can improve your performance on almost any task by controlling the noise you are exposed to while working. In addition, by removing disturbing noise from your environment, you can reduce stress levels, improve general well-being, and prevent permanent hearing impairment.

Earmuffs are also becoming increasingly popular with people who are hypersensitive to noise, and sufferers from hyperacusis, misophonia, autism and ADHD.

I have found noise cancelling earmuffs to be among the most effective tools for studying. And it’s not only me: Search Google Images for memory championships and you will see participants wearing industrial earmuffs.

This review looks at general noise blocking effectiveness of different earmuffs and comfort and suitability for different types of noises, including low frequency noise and human speech. I focus on enhancing cognitive performance and general well-being rather than hearing protection in industrial settings and on the shooting range. That being said, you will find an in-depth comparison of manufacturers’ attenuation data.

In my quest to find the most effective, most comfortable and most fashionable earmuffs, I have purchased and used quite a number of different models. In this review I am going to look at the following:

  • Overall noise blocking effectiveness
  • Low-frequency and human speech blocking effectiveness
  • Comfort
  • Manufacturing quality and durability
  • Discreteness
  • Earmuffs for sleeping

The models in this review include:

  • 3M Peltor X5A
  • 3M Peltor X4A
  • 3M Peltor Optime 105
  • 3M Peltor Optime 98
  • 3M Peltor Optime 95
  • Howard Leight Leightning L3 (with some references to the Leighting L2 and Leightning L1)

My personal earmuffs ranking

Before I delve into the details about which earmuffs are best for which application, here is my overall ranking. Please note that this ranking is personal and does not only account for noise reduction, but also general usability, comfort, weight, build quality, and price.

All earmuffs included in this ranking, except for the last one, are good noise blockers. I would be happy if you gave me any one of these to fend off distracting noise while trying to concentrate. The last one is too weak for louder environments and is included for people who want to use earmuffs during sleep.

  1. 3M Peltor X5A
  2. 3M Peltor Optime 105
  3. 3M Peltor Optime 98
  4. Howard Leight Leightning L3
  5. 3M Peltor X4A
  6. 3M Peltor Optime 95

1. 3M Peltor X5A, NRR 31 dB

3M Peltor X5A earmuffsThe Peltor X5A clearly stand out. They block noise better than any other earmuffs I know. Whether you need to block low-frequency noise, human speech, or high-frequency noise, these earmuffs do it all. They are the only ones than can compete with the Leightning L3 on low-pitched noise and they clearly outperform the L3 in every other frequency band. Because they attenuate so well across a wide range of frequencies, their speech blocking ability is a step ahead of all the others.

Consequently, these are not the earmuffs to get if you want to understand what people around you are saying.

The X5A are extremely well made, reasonably comfortable and adjustable.

The main drawbacks: Weighing 12.4 ounces (351 g), they are a bit on the heavy side, and there is no mistaking them for headphones. Wearing them, you are going to look like an aircraft mechanic.

But if you need the best noise blocking, these are the earmuffs to get.

2. 3M Peltor Optime 105, NRR 30 dB

3M Peltor Optime 105 H10A earmuffsThe Peltor Optime 105 are very effective earmuffs that block noise well across all frequencies. The X5A are a bit more effective, but not by a magnitude.

These are as adjustable as the X5A (and more so than the Leightning L3). At 9.3 ounces (265 g), they are also lighter, and I find them a tad more comfortable. The X5A are built a bit better, but I haven’t managed to do any damage to the Optime 105 either. They are out-edged by the Leightning L3 when it comes to low-frequency noise, but better than the L3 for speech and high-frequency noise.

I recently gave mine away to a friend who was in dire need of a good pair to keep his sanity. He loves them as well. I had a really hard time parting with them, but didn’t want to give away the X5A.

So yes, I prefer the X5A, but it is close. If you are looking for earmuffs that offer high noise reduction, you won’t go wrong with Optime 105. They are usually a bit cheaper than the X5A.

3. 3M Peltor Optime 98, NRR 25 dB

3M Peltor Optime 98 H9A earmuffsThe Peltor Optime 98 are great all-around earmuffs to take the edge off of noise. They are easy to carry around and work well in moderate-noise coffee shops and open offices. They are sturdy, very light (7.8 ounces, 221 g) and adjustable, and feature a low profile. I find them very comfortable.

Do you have a child who is hypersensitive to noise due to autism or ADHD, or just want earmuffs to take your kids along to an event? Try the Peltor Optime 98. They tend to fit children as well and are really light and carefree.

If you can sleep on your back, you might even be able to sleep in them. Many people actually do. (See the section what are the best ear muffs for sleeping on how you can improve on their comfort.)

For human speech and high-frequency noise the Optime 98 perform about as well as the Leightning L3 and the X4A, albeit not nearly as well as the X5A and the Optime 105.

If are you are looking for great low-frequency noise blocking, these are not the muffs to get.

All in all the Optime 98 are great earmuff for adults and kids, and as far as I am concerned, the most comfortable ones.

4. Howard Leight Leightning L3 (by Honeywell), NRR 30 dB

Howard Leight Leightning L3In overall noise-reduction, the Leightning L3 are on par with the Optime 105 and a step behind the X5A. They are great for low-frequency noise reduction, as good as the X5A, and they are significantly lighter (10.6 ounces, 300 g) than the X5A.

I find them quite comfortable. If you are trying to get rid of rumbling machines or low-pitched humming, they are a great choice. Howard Leight really seems to have a special formula for low-frequency noise blocking.

They are, however, significantly worse than the X5A and the Optime 105 at blocking human speech and high-frequency noise.

The overall built-quality is good, but the headband cushion is made of a soft material that is quite sensitive. I managed to unintentionally damage the headband at two locations with my finger nails.

They are adjustable, but less so than Peltor earmuffs. They do fit me and are quite comfortable, but I have to pull out the ear-cups to the max. I have a medium-size head.

5. 3M Peltor X4A, NRR 27 dB

3M Peltor X4A earmuffsThe Peltor X4A are the highest-rated low-profile earmuffs I know of. In terms of noise-blocking effectiveness, they are a bit better than their nearest competitor, the Optime 98, but, at least for me, it is not a big difference. They are sturdier, built with more premium materials, and work better for low-frequency noise than the Optime 98, but they usually also cost a bit more.

IMO, their main advantage is that they feature a really low profile, look sleek and can be mistaken for futuristic Bluetooth headphones. At 8.3 ounces (235 g) they are almost as light as the Optime 98.

I have used them for quite a while and find them reasonably comfortable, but not as comfortable as the Optime 98.

6. 3M Peltor Optime 95, NRR 21 dB

3M Peltor Optime 95 H6A earmuffs At 5.5 ounces (155 g), the Peltor Optime 95 are the lightest of all earmuffs in this review.

I got these earmuffs for a special application: Having read positive reviews by other “sleepers,” I wanted to see whether they can be used while sleeping on the side.

I would usually go with foam earplugs because I find them comfortable and more effective than the Optime 95, but these might be an option for people who cannot tolerate earplugs.

Indeed, together with a ring pillow with a hole in the middle, they are a viable option. A memory-foam version of that pillow would probably be even better.

As others have done, you can even upgrade them with the special Peltor gel sealing rings HY80 to make them more comfortable.

They feature a lower profile than the Optime 98, but with my pillow the Optime 98 worked as well. Since the Optime 98 attenuate noise a lot better, I would try the 98 first. What’s more, the expensive gel ear pads also fit the Optime 98.

Since the Optime 95 are cheap, you could buy them in addition to the 98 and see which ones work better for you. If you are a back sleeper who can’t tolerate earplugs, I would get the Optime 98. They are as comfortable and a lot more effective.

I wouldn’t get the Optime 95 for any other applications as their noise blocking effectiveness is a bit too low for my taste.

My noise blocking earmuffs comparison table (10 points is best)

noise blocking earmuffs comparison tableWhat is in the noise reduction rating? What is the NRR and what is the SNR?

In both the US and Europe, reputable manufacturers provide a single-number noise reduction rating for all earmuffs they sell. This number is intended to provide you with a convenient and fast way to assess the noise reducing capability of a particular pair of earmuffs and its suitability to protect your hearing when exposed to noise up to a certain level.

Note, however, that this single-number noise reduction rating was obtained in a laboratory and tends to overstate real-world attenuation. What’s more, there is some variation in test results (even according to the same standard) between different labs as well.

Earmuffs sold in the US state the NRR (noise reduction rating), while earmuffs intended to be sold in Europe specify the SNR (single number rating).

The standards and testing procedures in the US and Europe are different, so these numbers are not directly comparable.

The European SNR for the same earmuffs tends to be higher than the US NRR, so make sure you know which number you are actually looking at: for example, when sold in the US, the 3M Peltor X5A box states an NRR of 31 dB, and when sold in Europe an SNR of 37 dB.

Reputable manufacturers such as 3M and Honeywell tend to be very clear about which standard and number they are referring to.

Some manufacturers and importers are not always clear about which rating they are talking about.

For example, in the description on Amazon you might read something like “highest noise reduction of 34 decibels,” but, when digging deeper, the number actually refers to the SNR, which is at best confusing when the earmuffs are being sold in the US.

In the US the relevant standard is ANSI S3.19-1974, while in Europe, it is EN 352-1:2002.

The attenuation of earmuffs varies greatly with the noise frequency, so the noise reduction rating doesn’t tell the whole story

Because the NRR (and the SNR) are weighted averages of tested attenuation levels at various frequencies, two earmuffs with exactly the same NRR can behave quite differently in a certain situation.

For example, the Howard Leightning L3 and the 3M Peltor Optime 105 both have an NRR of 30 dB.

However their attenuation data for different frequency bands is quite different:

Two earmuffs can have the same NRR, yet behave very differently at different frequencies.

The Leightning L3 earmuffs block low-frequency noise better than the the 3M Optime 105, while for mid-range frequencies the two muffs attenuate about the same, and for high frequency noise, the Optime 105 is better than the L3.

How is earmuffs’ attenuation measured in the US?

Each frequency in the table refers to the center frequency of a narrow band. For each center frequency, test subjects listen to a pulsed pink noise signal with a bandwidth of 1/3 octave with and without the earmuffs to measure the attenuation. For example, for the center frequency of 125 Hz, the one-third octave band is 112 – 141 Hz. The test is performed in a laboratory with 10 test persons of normal hearing, who each undergo the test three times. Each attenuation number in the table is the average of 30 hearing tests.

How important are the different frequencies in a real-world setting?

If, for example, you are sitting in an open office, trying to cancel the chatter of colleagues, the Optime 105 are a better choice because they are better at blocking the frequency range relevant to human speech intelligibility. For more on this below.

On the other hand, if you are working next to a rumbling machine, the Leightning L3 should work better for you.

The European standard provides for an additional three-number rating system, which makes it easier to see the difference:

L3 and Optime 105 earmuffs three-number rating(Note: In terms of noise reduction the 3M Peltor Optime III is equivalent to the Optime 105 but tested according to the European standard.)

You won’t get this three-number rating in the US, but you can always look at the frequency attenuation table detailing the attenuation for each frequency band.

If a manufacturer doesn’t provide this data in their description, ask them for the table!

They must have it if they have had their earmuffs certified. Also, make sure it is clearly stated which testing standard has been applied!

Here is the European attenuation data for the two earmuffs.

L3 and Optime III EU frequency table

Take note that the test procedure and test frequencies are different in the EU. You can compare earmuffs using either table, but shouldn’t compare data from different tables, obtained according to different testing standards.

Overall noise blocking effectiveness for the reviewed earmuffs

  1. Peltor X5A
  2. Peltor Optime 105 and Howard Leight Leightning L3
  3. Peltor X4A and Optime 98
  4. Peltor Optime 95

Why don’t good earmuffs block all noise?

When looking at the tables below, you may wonder why earmuffs (and earplugs for that matter) don’t provide perfect noise blocking.

Apart from leakage and conduction through the earmuffs, there is another important reason: bone conduction. Sound waves also reach our inner ear via our skull and the soft tissue not enclosed by the earmuffs. This limits what attenuation earmuffs and earplugs can provide.

Even if the perfect muffs existed, you would likely still hear people shouting. The sound would just get to your ear via a different pathway.

Bone conduction is estimated to limit the maximum achievable attenuation of “normal” hearing protectors to around 47 dB at 125 Hz, 48 dB at 1000 Hz, 40 dB at 2000 Hz, and 49 dB at 4000 Hz.

A noise blocking helmet covering the whole head would offer additional attenuation. In an experiment using such a helmet (and combining it with earmuffs and earplugs), 55 to 63 dB attenuation (at 1000- 1400 Hz) were achieved, but who wants to sit around and sweat wearing a helmet?

Attenuation data for the reviewed earmuffs according to US standard ANSI S3.19-1974 (as stated by the manufacturers)

Attenuation data for all reviewed earmuffs according to US standard ANSI S3.19-1974Attenuation data for the reviewed earmuffs according to European standard EU 352-1:2002 (as stated by the manufacturers)

Attenuation data for the reviewed earmuffs according to European standard EU 352-1:2002European three-number rating system (as stated by the manufacturers)

Earmuffs data: European three-number rating systemBest earmuffs for blocking human speech

The frequency range from 500 Hz to 4000 Hz is the most important one for speech intelligibility. Since speech is distracting and impairs performance on a variety of cognitive tasks, office workers and students want to wear earmuffs or earplugs that attenuate very well in this frequency range. The frequency band around 2000 Hz is the most important one, followed by 4000 Hz, 1000 Hz, and 500 Hz.

In my own subjective tests in coffee shops, office environments, and while watching TV, the best earmuffs for blocking human speech were clearly the Peltor X5A, followed by the Peltor Optime 105. The muffs in third place work reasonably well with speech, but simply stand no chance against the X5A.

Here is my own subjective ranking for voice blocking:

  1. Peltor X5A
  2. Peltor Optime 105
  3. Peltor X4A, Peltor Optime 98, Howard Leight Leighting L3
  4. Peltor Optime 95

Why do I have three muffs in third place? I couldn’t decide which pair was better. All three worked reasonably well, but my preference changed depending on whether the speaker was male or female. The X4A and the Optime 98 muffled more, while the Leighnting L3 cancelled more of the lower pitched parts of human speech.

With speech, the highly-rated Howard Leight Leightning L3 earmuffs performed a lot worse than the similarly rated Peltor Optime 105. Looking at the frequency table, this is no surprise. The L3 attenuate a lot less in the crucial frequency range than both the X5A and the Optime 105.

I don’t own the Howard Leight Leightning L2 and L1, but looking at their frequency table, I would not consider them for cancelling speech.

On the other hand, if you want to understand human speech while wearing ear muffs to block moderate noise, the Leightning L2 and L1, and the Peltor Optime 95 might be good options.

Low-Frequency noise blocking

  1. 3M Peltor X5A and Howard Leight Leightning L3
  2. 3M Peltor Optime 105
  3. 3M Peltor X4A
  4. 3M Peltor Optime 98
  5. 3M Peltor Optime 95

If you are looking to get rid of the rumble of machines or trucks or low-frequency hum of compressors, the X5A and Leightning L3 are the to-go muffs. At the lowest frequencies, I have the feeling that the L3 even slightly out-edge the X5A. The X5A perform better at the “higher” low-frequency noise bands. Both of them clearly perform a lot better than the rest.

If reducing lower-pitched noise is your main objective, the overall great Optime 98 are going to disappoint you. The Optime 105 and X4A offer decent low-frequency noise attenuation.

What are the best earmuffs for sleeping?

Earmuffs in general aren’t that great for sleeping because they are bulky and the clamping force necessary to block noise might make them uncomfortable when wearing them for a whole night.

Earplugs or the combination of earplugs and sleep headphones are my preference for noise blocking during sleep. If you are a back sleeper with a lot of cash, you could also consider noise-cancelling headphones.

That being said, for back sleepers who cannot tolerate earplugs, earmuffs are an alternative worth trying, and some people use them every night.

What’s more, the double protection of earmuffs and earplugs adds a few decibels of attenuation, which might make it possible for you to sleep in a noisy environment in which sleep might otherwise be impossible.

My favorite earmuffs for sleeping on my back are the Peltor Optime 98 because I find them the most comfortable. The Optime 95 work as well, but they provide less noise reduction. Both the Optime 98 and 95 can even be upgraded for more comfort with the Peltor Camelback Gel Sealing Rings HY80 (on the right side in the image).

Peltor Gel Sealing Rings HY80 vs. standard ear padsThese super-soft cooling gel ear pads distribute the pressure better and provide for more room for the ears.

They really do make the muffs more comfortable, but at a pretty steep price.

Optime 98 with Peltor Camelback HY80

If you are considering sleeping with earmuffs on your side, they might make even this possible.

If you are a back sleeper who needs to get rid of low-frequency noise, you could alternatively try the Leightning L3. They are bulky, so they probably won’t work for a side sleeper, but they are quite comfortable and not too heavy.

How can you sleep with earmuffs on your side?

As I mentioned before, if you can tolerate foam earplugs, use these as a side sleeper. If you must use earmuffs, you need lower-profile muffs such as the Optime 95, and you need a pillow with an opening for the ear cups. I have tested the ring-pillow shown below, and it works reasonably well.

ring pillow for earmuffs

It is, in fact, deep enough to also fit the Optime 98. A memory-foam pillow with an opening would probably work even better.

As a side sleeper, I would get both the Optime 98 and 95 to see which ones work better. If, after testing, you feel this solution can work for you, you could improve on the comfort of the earmuffs by substituting the Peltor gel seals HY80 for the standard ear pads.

On a different note, the low-profile X4A have a different headband, which doesn’t allow me to fall asleep on my side.

Conclusion

In this review, we have looked in detail at 6 different earmuffs and compared them on overall noise reduction, low-frequency noise cancelling, voice blocking, high frequency noise blocking, comfort, weight, and build quality.

By removing excessive environmental noise, you can significantly improve your cognitive performance, general well-being, and sleep. You are also taking steps to protecting your hearing.

This post doesn’t focus on hearing protection in a workshop or industrial settings, although the earmuffs reviewed here are all being produced for protecting your hearing in such settings. Office workers, students and memory athletes are increasingly using them because they work for them as well.

By all means, if you are exposed to noise on the job, work with your employer to assess the noise level and get appropriate protection for the noise level you are exposed to.

I recommend adding two pairs of earmuffs to your arsenal: I would get one pair of high noise reduction earmuffs such as the Peltor X5A (or the Peltor Optime 105) and one pair of general purpose earmuffs such as the light-weight Peltor Optime 98 (or alternatively the X4A).

Owning these two, you are well equipped to fend off noise intrusions. You will have a pair for maximum protection and a pair you can just pull out of your backpack or bag when you feel overwhelmed by the noise around you.  The Optime 98 also tend to work well for most children.


References:

  • “Audio Frequency.” Wikipedia, February 2, 2017. https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Audio_frequency&oldid=763221171.
  • Eddy B. Brixen. “Facts about Speech Intelligibility.” DPA Microphones, January 2016. http://www.dpamicrophones.com/mic-university/facts-about-speech-intelligibility.
  • Gerges, Samir NY, Mr L. Vedsmand, Mr H. Lester, and Kampmannsgade BAT-Kartellet. “Personal Measures and Hearing Conservation.” Geneva, Switzerland: Special Report of World Health Organization, 1995. http://cdrwww.who.int/entity/occupational_health/publications/noise11.pdf.
  • Ravicz, Michael E., and Jennifer R. Melcher. “Isolating the Auditory System from Acoustic Noise during Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Examination of Noise Conduction through the Ear Canal, Head, and Body.” The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 109, no. 1 (January 2001): 216–31.
  • The Engineering ToolBox. “Octave Band Frequencies.” The Engineering Toolbox. Accessed July 5, 2017. http://www.engineeringtoolbox.com/octave-bands-frequency-limits-d_1602.html.

16 thoughts on “My Top 6 Noise Blocking Earmuffs Review

  1. Very nice review. Thanks for sharing. Could you please tell your comments about using any of these with in ear headphones? By your experience, what is the isolation performance impact of using earbuds inside the earmuffs? Does the wiring feel unconfortable when pressed under the earmuffs pads against the ear? Thanks

  2. Hello Fábio,

    In have used earmuffs with earbuds underneath for listening to podcasts, watching lectures, noise masking with white noise, etc.

    Generally, the earmuffs almost completely retain their noise blocking performance. The small wires do not seem to lead to major leakage. I have used the Peltor X5A, Optime 105, and Optime 98 together with earbuds. The X4A are not very comfortable with earbuds underneath.
    In terms of comfort, it does matter which earbuds you use. The Sennheiser CX 300 II work for me. They almost do not protrude from the ear. However, the wires do pinch the ear a bit.
    In any case, it is good enough for me for an hour or two. It is really amazing how much clearer podcasts and lectures become when everyday noise has been removed.

    Surprisingly, I have found my trusted pair of Panasonic earbuds that sit on top of the ear canal (instead of in the ear) more comfortable. Somehow the earmuffs squeeze the ear canal a bit, but this isn’t a problem with this type.

    I also have a pair of Panasonic in-ear earbuds, which generally sound great. Unfortunately, they become uncomfortable after a short time underneath.

    Another economical alternative would be the Howard Leight Sync Noise-Blocking Stereo earmuffs.

    I was considering buying them, but ultimately got the Bose QC35 noise cancelling headphones. I use earmuffs a lot, but these days more for when I want it quiet rather than when listening to music or podcasts.
    Have a good day.

  3. Hi Rob,
    I bought that pillow in a home decoration store while traveling in Taiwan. I just looked at it, but I can’t find the brand name. I just had a look on Amazon: “donut pillow for head” brings up a few results. I haven’t tried any of these though.
    All the best.

  4. Hello!
    Excellent article. But still I have a question I hope you could help me answering:
    I need an ear muff for studying, since my home environment tends to be noisy (sometimes dogs barking loudly or neighbors listening to music)

    I am looking for efficiency and comfort. My candidates are:
    – Peltor X4A
    – Optime 98 (H9A)

    My question is, why does the X4A get a 7.5 in comfort? Does it squeezes the head more than the Optime 98?
    Lastly, have you ever heard of the 3M Muffler (little red one)? Compared to these mentioned above, is it good?

    Best regards!

  5. Hello Henrique,

    I am glad you found the article useful.
    To your questions:
    First of all, I find all earmuffs I have written about in this post reasonably comfortable, including the X4A.

    The Optime 98 ear cups have larger openings to accommodate the ear:
    3M Peltor Optime 98, size of the opening: 6.5 cm x 3.8 cm (length x width)
    3M Peltor X4A: 5.9 cm x 3.2 cm
    Source: own measurements

    In the Optime 98, my ear lobes have all the space they need, while in the X4A the fit is a bit tight.
    Also, if I put them on too fast, the X4A give me a bit of a suction feeling.

    That being said. I have often worn the X4A in coffee shops for several hours and without major issues.

    IMO, both the Optime 98 and the X4A are good earmuffs: The X4A attenuate low frequency noise better; the Optime 98 provide more space for the ears.

    I have no problem with either earmuffs’ clamping force.

    As to the 3M Red Mufflers: I don’t own them, but just did a bit of reading. They seem to be folding earmuffs. With an NRR of 21 db(A), they would be too weak for me in terms of noise reduction, so I wouldn’t buy them for studying at home.

    If you are going to wear your earmuffs at home, looks probably don’t matter that much at all: If you want it as quiet as possible, why not aim for the X5A or the Optime 105? You are getting a lot more attenuation for a little more money.

    All the best.

  6. What a fantastic post. Thank you so much; this is hugely helpful and fun to read. I say this with fondness; this was the nerdiest post about earmuffs I’ve seen on my quest for noise cancelling earmuffs.

    Unfortunately I found this post a tiny bit too late and ended up purchasing “3M Pro-Grade” earmuffs at my local hardware store.
    Have you heard of them? If so, how do you think they compare to the X5A or the Optime 105?

    In combination with earplugs, they seem to mute most conversation sounds – I wore them in the library and they effected a “I’m alone now, focus time” feeling. They truly drown out the world around you. So I’m not so concerned with the effectiveness.

    But I’m wondering how the “3M Pro-Grade” compare comfort-wise with the X5A or the Optime 105. I sit for hours upon hours in loud conversation spaces to read and write, and comfort is a big factor for staying focused.

    Any advice?

  7. Hello Enno,
    thank you for the thumbs up.

    Unfortunately, I do not own the 3M Pro-Grade, so I can’t comment on their wearing comfort.

    Noise attenuation wise they seem to be on par with the Optime 105 and a bit behind the X5A.
    But as you have said, you are getting all the noise blocking you need, so no need to shoot for the X5A for extra attenuation.

    Since you are wearing double-protection with earplugs underneath, you are getting pretty close to the physical limits of what can be achieved with passive hearing protection anyway.

    Here are two ideas (albeit expensive ones) how you could achieve more comfort and great voice blocking:

    1. The 3M Camelback gel earpads mentioned in this post would likely increase the comfort quite a bit. Unfortunately, I don’t know if they would fit your earmuffs. Maybe shoot a short message to 3M. These earpads cost more than the muffs though.

    2. I also have a pair of Bose QC35 headphones and I use them a lot in cafes. If you combine these with earplugs you get a very good level of voice blocking with very comfortable headphones. But this solution means serious $$.

    Have a great day.

  8. Thank you so much. You’re amazing. So many places review noise cancelling headphones or earmuffs for ear protection or noise quality. This is the only review I’ve found that looks at noise cancelling needs for sensory issues (like ASD, ADHD and SPD). Noise sensitivity affects a surprisingly large portion of the population who become severely distressed by noise in the environment to a degree that they can become depressed and suicidal. I will definitely be sharing your review and hopefully your hard work will make existence for members of this population so so so much easier

    p.s. I’d wear a helmet if it stopped all noise.

  9. Hello Sophie,
    thank you very much for your kind feedback.

    I don’t know if you have already looked into noise masking with white noise? You still need noise blocking as your first line of defense.
    If you don’t mind the sound of a steady stream of water and wearing earmuffs with earbuds underneath is comfortable enough for you, you can (in most situations) completely rid yourself of all chatter, as well as crunching and creaking noises. For speech – this is my ultimate defense.

    Yes that helmet. They might have a commercial one for MRI available at some point. I am afraid it will be prohibitively expensive though.

    Have a wonderful day.

  10. I love this article. It has really helped me out. I have high frequency hearing loss, wear hearing aids, have hyperacusis, tinnitus, and work in a very loud open office. My first foray into using hearing protection at the office involved a pair of Optime 95, before I found this article. You were right, they definitely don’t block enough noise. I could basically still hear everyone around me at my desk. So I invested in the x5a and they are so much better with blocking noise, but have a little bit of a stronger clamp than I was hoping for. I was thinking about trying out the 105s for more comfort, and I already have a pair of the gel pads as well. However, I don’t really want to lose the ultimate blocking power of the x5a! Do you think it’s worth it, or should I wait for the x5a to stretch out a bit? I will say the Optime 95 are extremely comfortable, so I am very tempted by the 105. I’m splitting ears, I mean hairs at this point 🙂

  11. Hello Mark,

    thank you very much for your feedback.

    Comfort-wise, I think the main difference between X5A and the Optime 105 is as follows:
    * The Optime 105 is about 60g (2 oz.) lighter than the X5A. I can feel this weight difference.
    * The Optime 105’s ear pads have a wider opening (6.3 x 3.7 cm) than the X5A’s ear pads (5.6 x 3.2 cm). The opening for the Optime 105 is about the same as for the 95.

    My ears feel somewhat more at ease in the Optime 105. This is not a major issue for me, but depending on your ear size it may be for you.

    If you still have the Optime 95 and your gel ear pads, you could do the following:
    * Replace the X5A ear pads with the gel ear pads. (The Camelback gel ear pads have a very large opening and fit in the X5A ear cups.)
    * You can use the Optime 95 headband with the X5A ear cups to see whether this reduces the clamping force. (Just swap out the ear cups.)

    I actually prefer the X5A headband, but everyone is different.

    Should it turn out that the weight of the X5A earmuffs is the main issue for you, the Optime 105 would be a good option to try.

    In terms of noise reduction, the Optime 105 are a fine pair of muffs. They are not quite as strong as the X5A, but pretty close. They are light years ahead of the Optime 95.

    I have come to understand that everyone’s anatomy is different. So it really is worth trying what works best for you. (You might even decide to alternate between the two muffs.)

    Even with normal headphones (that have a very low clamping force), one person will perceive a particular pair as very comfortable, while another person will feel that the phones are pinching their ears.

    All the best to you.

  12. As the others have said, great article!!

    I have severe hyperacusis and I am in need of serious noise blocking. I own a pair of QC35, and I am wondering how these compare with the passive ear muffs in your review in terms of noice cancellation?

    Best regards,
    Johan

  13. Hello Johan,

    good earmuffs such as the X5A and the Optime 105, but even including the Optime 98 tend to attenuate the intermediate frequencies, I would say roughly from 500 to 3150 Hz significantly better than the Bose QC35.

    Speech and most everyday noise appear significantly quieter when wearing strong earmuffs than when wearing the QC35. Most of what annoys me in coffee shops and open offices is blocked better by earmuffs that are at least on par with the Optime 98.

    The unique strengths of the QC35 are low-frequency noise cancelling and wearing comfort.

    For example, the low-frequency parts of washers, ACs, traffic rumbling, and turbine humming are very effectively cancelled by the QC35 headphones. They even remove most of the bass of an audio system’s subwoofer.

    Removing these low-frequency components significantly increases my well-being. I feel a lot lighter without all this rumbling, so despite their weaknesses the Bose are a great piece of equipment.

    Obviously they are also good for listening to music. 🙂

    A pair of well-fitting foam earplugs underneath the QC35 will give you a feeling of what good earmuffs (e.g., X5A and Optime 105) can do for speech and everyday noise blocking. In the low-frequency range this will even outperform the muffs.

    Have a great day.

Leave a Reply